Sunday, March 22, 2020

Analyse Vitai Lampada Essay Example

Analyse Vitai Lampada Essay Example Analyse Vitai Lampada Paper Analyse Vitai Lampada Paper Essay Topic: poem In my view, Vitai Lampada is a poem of strength and power. It illustrates war through the use of the imagery of soldiers playing games . The patriotic references appear to be out of place with the historical context of that time. The author, Henry Newbolt, writes about war in this way, so that he can get his view of war across in a more defined manner. The poem has a positive air about it and is written with a fast tempo and quick rhythm, using a lot of rhymes and anaphoric phrasing. Newbolt uses short lines with very few syllables per line. The poem shows the writer to be very exact in his choice of words. We learn for example that the participants of the war are patriotic soldiers. Finally, he also uses very precise poetic techniques using grammar to control the pace. Newbolt shows war as almost a game. He does this by using certain phrases, especially Play up! Play up! Play the game! Games are used as a metaphor of what war can do and the impact of war, which he likens to a game of cricket. He illustrates this very clearly in the first paragraph. This is a very good device used in the poem Newbolts first paragraph, portrays a game of cricket and introduces us to this idea of playing the game. Also, this first paragraph introduces the player, who is to be the deciding batter on who wins or loses the game, and does everything for his captain. We know this because in the poem it says But his Captains hand on his shoulder smote, in reference to why the batter would give the game his best effort for his captain. This paves the way for the soldiers during the war to fight and be brave for their commanding officer. The tone of Newbolts poem contrasts greatly with many poems written about the First World War. He has a more traditionalist view like that of poets who have written about previous wars as for example the poet Tennyson in his poem The Charge of the Light Brigade. Despite all the bloodshed and the death, which are illustrated in metaphoric lines like The river of death has brimmed his banks, and The sand of the desert is sodden red Newbolt still gives war the feeling of it being a game, and of there being hope, by ending with the phrase But the voice of a schoolboy rallies the ranks: Play up! Play up! Play the game! The tone and voice of the poems is very strong and powerful and intended to beat to rhythm and pace. The lines Play up exemplify this! Play up! Play the game! These are short sharp lines with seven, eight or nine syllables per line and short words, e. g. An hour to play and the last man in, and the rhyming in the poem, eg. The sand of the desert is sodden red The Gatlings jammed and the captains dead. However, despite the fast pace, he also slows the pace before significant lines such as Play up! Play up! Play the game! by adding in colons and hyphens. Lastly, Newbolt emphasizes the patriotic fervour of the soldiers by his word use, e. g. This they all with a joyful mind, Bear through it like a torch in flame, joyful adds to the game idea and a torch of flame signifies power, strength might etc as it was commonly used in medieval battles and has been recreated especially well in the Lord of the Rings trilogy with the armies battling at night. The patriotism is emphasized by the phrases referring to her meaning England. It is also emphasized by the story-like nature of the poem. It has a beginning in which it introduces the idea of the game, a middle in which he describes the battle and incorporates the idea of a game and an end, which talks about the battle being recalled and the soldiers being heroes. It is especially the last paragraph that confirms the feeling of patriotism and commitment to the war effort. To conclude my analysis of Newbolts poem Vitai Lampada I can say that the poem, in my opinion, is a very strong, quick and powerful poem, mainly due to the rhythm and poetic techniques, and it is also a patriotic poem which illustrates the nature of war as likened on to a game.

Thursday, March 5, 2020

Taxation without representatio essays

Taxation without representatio essays During the colonization of the new world England was strongly against allowing colonies to engage in manufacturing their own goods and products as a form of econmic stability america. From the English point of view and mindset, I would completely agree how they ran the government and their colonies. They wanted to maintain the dependency that the group of people whom left England had on the motherland. Any country would do the same because of the great losses you would recieve in economnics if a large portion of working people left and formed their own independant group. The colonies manufacturing their own goods would mean that England would be unable to reap tax dues, and benefit from exporting to the new world. So, of course as the English motherland, I would feel they are totally correct. Why would you want to let a large amount of people stray off from your country and cause your economics to come to a downfall. As a large power you want control of everything. It would be intolerable for the new colonies to break off from England. Also, if the colonies manufactured their own goods they would self-harvest the ingredients/items/materials to create the goods. Another loss of money for the British. If colonists created copper pots for an inn, without importing from England, this would mean that the English don't tax the product, they don't get money for the copper material, and they get no money for the pots. Although this is a rare prediciment, it is how I could best explain the situation. I totally agree with what the English were doing and even know because we overcame them to become the great country we are today, the English was doing the right thing. While England wanted the new colonies to prosper, it was not for independance, it was to support the motherland. Some people could probably see the English as being tyrants and terrible people during the times they oppressed the colonies and forced strict laws ...